Evidence of Coal-Fly-Ash Toxic Chemical Geoengineering in the Troposphere: Consequences for Public Health
J. Marvin Herndon
Abstract: The widespread, intentional and increasingly frequent chemical emplacement in the troposphere has gone unidentified and unremarked in the scientific literature for years. The author presents evidence that toxic coal combustion fly ash is the most likely aerosolized particulate sprayed by tanker-jets for geoengineering, weather-modification and climate-modification purposes and describes some of the multifold consequences on public health. Two methods are employed: (1) Comparison of 8 elements analyzed in rainwater, leached from aerosolized particulates, with corresponding elements leached into water from coal fly ash in published laboratory experiments, and (2) Comparison of 14 elements analyzed in dust collected outdoors on a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter with corresponding elements analyzed in un-leached coal fly ash material. The results show: (1) the assemblage of elements in rainwater and in the corresponding experimental leachate are essentially identical. At a 99% confidence interval, they have identical means (T-test) and identical variances (F-test); and (2) the assemblage of elements in the HEPA dust and in the corresponding average un-leached coal fly ash are likewise essentially identical. The consequences on public health are profound, including exposure to a variety of toxic heavy metals, radioactive elements, and neurologically-implicated chemically mobile aluminum released by body moisture in situ after inhalation or through transdermal induction.
On 2nd September 2015, this paper was retracted.
“The retraction of my peer-reviewed and published scientific paper was based upon a systematic, aggressive attack by one or more individuals making blatantly false and/or pejorative remarks." ~ Herndon
The following is Herndon’s rebuttal of the first criticism that was used as a basis for rejection of his paper.
Allegation: The value for average leachate concentration of Aluminum mentioned in Table 1 and used by [Herndon] to normalize the data presented in Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5 is incorrect.
Response: Not true. The incorrect data was not for the average leachate concentration, but for the average un-leached coal fly ash composition. The incorrect data was only used to normalize the data presented in Figures 4 and 5, not in Figures 2 and 3.
Allegation: The author uses 70,000 µg/kg, while the correct value resulting from the unleached European coal fly ash samples measurements published by Moreno et al. ) is 140,000,000 µg/kg.
Response: Those criticizing my paper make it look like a huge error, and the half-truth makes it seem so. What should have been stated is that the un-leached column heading was mistyped as µg/kg, but should have read µg/g; the data were tabulated as µg/g. The error was in listing the aluminum value as 70,000 µg/g when it should have been 140,000 µg/g, a factor of two. In scientific literature, this is the kind of error that is usually allowed to be corrected as it should have been in the present instance.
Allegation: This error invalidates the conclusions of the article.
Response: No, it does not. In the worst case, if uncorrected, it might invalidate the data shown in Figures 4 and 5, but the conclusions of the article are derived from Figures 2 and 3 which are not affected by the error. Moreover, Figures 4 and 5, when normalized to another element, for example, barium are not invalidated.
Autism Risk Linked to Particulate Air Pollution
December 18, 2014
NEW YORK, Dec 18 (Reuters) – Children whose mothers were exposed to high levels of fine particulate pollution in late pregnancy have up to twice the risk of developing autism as children of mothers breathing cleaner air, scientists at Harvard School of Public Health reported on Thursday.
As medical and epidemiological mysteries go, autism is surely among the most shocking and tragic. Autism has been on the rise for decades, but now it's reached unbelievable levels. In 1975, only one in 5000 children in the U.S. was affected by autism. Now it's one child in 88, making it more common than schizophrenia.
A new Italian film, Chemtrails: The secret war has been released showing a disturbing covert military agenda behind the sinister phenomenon, one that according to evidence presented includes far more than weather manipulation for “climate change.”
New Delhi: A US-developed weapon system that strikes the atmosphere with a focussed electromagnetic beam is one of the reasons for causing global warming, the government reported on Monday.
uglytruth last edited by uglytruth
‘Scientists’ Publish Research Paper Supposedly Debunking Chemtrails
Posted on August 17, 2016 by State of the Nation
Mick West runs a website known as Metabunk.org which is dedicated to falsely debunking anything that is probably true and genuinely conspiratorial in nature. The website is a complete joke and should not be taken seriously for even a moment … about any topic whatsoever, even when they may be onto to something.
Ken Caldiera on the other hand is an atmospheric scientist who actually pioneered the science of chemical geoengineering. And yet he is one of the principal authors of the bogus study. He has in fact been a zealous advocate of weather modification and climate engineering throughout his academic and research career. How he deigns to present himself as a chemtrail denier is as ludicrous as it is inexplicable.
Massive US Senate Document On National And Global Weather Modification
January 13, 2017 By Activist Post
The Swiss filmmaker Matthias Hancke worked on his first documentary OVERCAST for almost seven years. In 2007 he realized for the first time, that the man-made cloud cover was not a natural byproduct from aviation. Therefore, he started his investigation with the intention to finally prove the ongoing geoengineering program in order to stop this crime.
Matthias conducted over 40 interviews in 10 different countries and spent thousands of hours on research and investigation to find out more about the aerosol spraying and why our public officials are not investigating it.
OVERCAST incorporated both sides of the controversy, the debunkers and established scientists as well as the activists. The film brilliantly shows how the debunkers debunk themselves with their limited argumentation and lack of scientific data.